God was his provision, protector, and guide

Isaac repeats Abraham’s mistakes

Although Isaac lived in the Promised Land, this did not translate to mean an easy life, free from hardship. God’s promises are true, but they do not eliminate difficulties, but assure God’s presence and guidance through challenges. Just as Abraham experienced a famine early in his journey of faith [Genesis 12:10], Isaac also encountered a famine in his own time.

There was a famine in the land, besides the first famine that was in the days of Abraham. And Isaac went to Abimelech king of the Philistines, in Gerar (Genesis 26:1).

Hardships can affect even those who are walking in God’s will. Famine was a serious crisis in the ancient world, crops failed, livestock died, and families faced hunger. Naturally, Isaac began to move south, likely seeking better conditions, just as his father had. However, unlike Abraham, who went all the way to Egypt in his famine, God intervened in Isaac’s situation. As he journeyed toward Gerar, and God warned him not to go further, but remain in the land God designated for him. This shows that God’s blessing is connected not just to the place but to obedience, trust, and faithfulness.

 

Abimelech takes Rebekah because Isaac says she is his sister

Abimelech’s rebuke of Isaac closely parallels earlier episodes involving Abraham. Twice before, a foreign ruler corrected Abraham for disguising Sarah as his sister, first Pharaoh [Genesis 12:18–19] and later the earlier Abimelech [Genesis 20:9–10]. These stories follow a similar pattern. A patriarch, fearing for his life, hides the truth about his wife. Then, a pagan ruler discovers the deception and rebukes the man of God. Next, God protects the covenant family despite their failure, and the pagan ruler ends up acting more righteously than the patriarch.

And Abimelech said, “What is this you have done to us? One of the people might soon have lain with your wife, and you would have brought guilt on us.” 11 So Abimelech charged all his people, saying, “He who touches this man or his wife shall surely be put to death.” (Genesis 26:10).

Abimelech’s rebuke of Isaac closely parallels earlier episodes involving Abraham. Twice before, a foreign ruler corrected Abraham for disguising Sarah as his sister, first Pharaoh [Genesis 12:18–19] and later the earlier Abimelech [Genesis 20:9–10]. These stories follow a similar pattern. A patriarch, fearing for his life, hides the truth about his wife. Then, a pagan ruler discovers the deception and rebukes the man of God. Next, God protects the covenant family despite their failure, and the pagan ruler ends up acting more righteously than the patriarch.

 Isaac digs the wells

We observe a pattern in Isaac’s life that highlights both human responsibility through through hard work and divine blessing, leading to prosperity. Isaac inherited substantial wealth from his father Abraham. This means he did not need to work to survive. Yet the passage emphasizes, that Isaac sowed in that land, through faith he planted crops in a time of famine. His harvest was extraordinary, a hundredfold in the same year, over and above normal agricultural effort could produce. Human effort is important, but God’s blessing is what multiplies it.

Then Isaac sowed in that land, and reaped in the same year a hundredfold; and the Lord blessed him. 13 The man began to prosper, and continued prospering until he became very prosperous; 14 for he had possessions of flocks and possessions of herds and a great number of servants. So the Philistines envied him Then Isaac sowed in that land, and reaped in the same year a hundredfold; and the Lord blessed him. 13 The man began to prosper, and continued prospering until he became very prosperous; 14 for he had possessions of flocks and possessions of herds and a great number of servants. So the Philistines envied him (Genesis 26:12-14).

Isaac’s increase was not a one-time event but a steady, compounding blessing on both his work and possessions. The man began to prosper, continued to prosper until he became very prosperous in terms of flocks, herds, and a great number of servants. Additionally, blessings mean he was comfortable and free from disease. His prosperity created envy among the Philistines of Gerar, who lived near him. Prosperity often attracts attention and jealousy.

 

Isaac digs the wells of Abraham

Isaac lived under God’s promises to Abraham, which brought protection and prosperity. The Philistines, seeing this divine favor, responded with envy, especially when Isaac grew increasingly wealthy. The envy of the Philistines did not remain a private feeling, it turned into action. The Philistines had stopped up all the wells which his father’s servants had dug and filled them with earth. In the ancient world, wells were life-giving resources, necessary for survival, livestock, agriculture, and settlement. Digging wells was costly and labor-intensive, often taking days or weeks of work. Therefore, destroying a well was an aggressive act that could provoke war.

Now the Philistines had stopped up all the wells which his father’s servants had dug in the days of Abraham his father, and they had filled them with earth (Genesis 26:12-15).

 

The Philistines’ willingness to destroy Isaac’s wells shows how deep their resentment had become. Despite this hostility, Isaac chose not to fight. He avoided escalating the conflict. He trusted God to care for him even if he moved away. He relocated, but not far and began reopening the wells his father Abraham had dug. His actions show humility, perseverance, and confidence in God’s provision rather than human retaliation. Isaac reopening Abraham’s wells becomes a symbolic lesson for life with God today. As Isaac reclaimed the physical wells dug by his father, we can return to the spiritual “wells” dug by previous generations, prayer, worship, Scripture, faithfulness, obedience. These resources do not expire; they continue to bring spiritual life if we pursue them. Spiritual strength and renewal often come from reclaiming and rediscovering the practices that sustained believers before us. What God used in the past, He can use again—if we are willing to seek Him.

 

The First Well was named Esek (contention/argument), the herdsmen of Gerar quarreled with Isaac’s servants over it. Their jealousy and hostility continued to follow Isaac. The name reveals the tension and conflict that came from others resenting God’s blessing on Isaac. Sometimes the first steps of obedience may bring resistance. The Second Well was named Sitnah (Opposition, accusation, or hostility). The locals fought over the well. It showed that the conflict was not an isolated issue, it was persistent and spiritual in nature. When God is blessing someone, opposition often increases. The Third Well named Rehoboth (Roominess” or wide spaces). The third well was different, no one quarreled over it. Isaac declared that the Lord has made room for him to be fruitful in the land.

And he moved from there and dug another well, and they did not quarrel over it. So he called its name Rehoboth, because he said, “For now the Lord has made room for us, and we shall be fruitful in the land.” (Genesis 26:22).

 

Rehoboth represented relief from conflict, a place of peace, God’s provision, a testimony that God makes space for His people. Isaac acknowledged that the peace at this well was not coincidence, it was God’s doing. God used the conflicts to work for good for Isaac. The sequence of wells, contention, opposition, and roominess was not random. God used these conflicts to lead Isaac back to Beersheba, the place where Abraham had lived and experienced God’s promises. At Beersheba, the Lord appeared to Isaac, God reaffirmed His covenant, and Isaac built an altar and worshiped. Isaac appreciated that blessing was connected not to the land itself, but to God’s presence with him.

 

God’s blessing upon Isaac

 As Isaac experienced repeated conflict with the Philistines, first contention, then opposition, he had every natural reason to fear for his life. His enemies were stronger, more established in the land, and openly hostile toward him. Yet, in this environment of rising tension, God reassured Isaac and told him not to be afraid. When God spoke this word of comfort and promise, Isaac responded in three important ways. Isaac build an altar, symbolism of worship, surrender, and acknowledgment of God’s presence, it was a declaration, that God was his provision, protector, and guide. This is evidence that Isaac chose to put God first, even before dealing with practical concerns like security or settling his household. Isaac pitched his tent, symbolizing he was a pilgrim and his life was temporal, and open to God’s leading.

So he built an altar there and called on the name of the Lord, and he pitched his tent there; and there Isaac’s servants dug a well (Genesis 26:22).

Isaac’s servants dug a well, this represents action, faithful work, and stewardship. Isaac did not sit passively waiting for God to provide, he responded to God’s promise with practical steps. Digging a well was a way of declaring we are settling here because God said He would bless us here. Isaac walked in the same paths of his father Abraham. Altars and tents marked Abraham’s life, demonstrating a life of worship and trust.

 

Esau marries, becoming a grief to his parents

Esau, the firstborn son of Isaac and the twin brother of Jacob, broke the spiritual pattern established by his grandfather Abraham. Abraham had been very intentional about ensuring that his descendants would not marry the women of Canaan because the Canaanites worshiped false gods and lived in ways that opposed God’s covenant purposes [Genesis 24:3–4]. The Hittites were part of the Canaanite peoples, known for their idolatry and immoral religious practices. By marrying them, Esau, ignored the spiritual values of his family, acted carelessly toward the covenant heritage, and chose pleasure and convenience over obedience and faith. His marriages caused deep sorrow and spiritual anguish to his parents because they could see his disregard for God’s ways.

When Esau was forty years old, he took as wives Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Basemath the daughter of Elon the Hittite. 35 And they were a grief of mind to Isaac and Rebekah (Genesis 26:35).

Esau’s actions reveal he was sexually immoral and treated holy things as worthless[Hebrews 12:16]. This was consistent with his life. He sold his birthright for a bowl of stew, placing immediate physical desires above the spiritual blessing. He married pagan women without thinking about God’s will or the spiritual consequences. Additionally, when he realized his parents disapproved, he tried to fix it by marrying another woman, but again without true repentance [Genesis 28:8–9]. The grief Esau caused Isaac and Rebekah was not about culture or personality, it was about spiritual concern. Esau’s marriages confirmed that he was drifting away from God and the covenant purpose for their family.

George G. Ruheni, PhD.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Creation

The pre-existence of the Word